Generative AI
Test + Evaluation
Platform BETA
Adversarial Testing for Proactive LLM Safety Evaluation
Designed for data scientists and compliance leaders, the Generative AI Test + Evaluation Platform BETA conducts automated testing of AI models, identifies vulnerabilities, and provides actionable insights to ensure models meet evolving regulatory standards and government compliance requirements.
Penetration Testing
Combining automated prompt generation with human expertise to expose potential vulnerabilities and biases.
Red Teaming
Test your AI with both human-led and automated red teaming at a fraction of the cost of traditional testing and at scale.
Contextual Evaluation
Assess your AI’s performance against real-world scenarios.
Risk Mitigation
Proactively identify and address risks through an integrated, comprehensive risk taxonomy, or bring your own.
Safety Assurance
Leverage conversational data for fine-tuning, model retraining, and regression testing.
Risk
Assessment.
- Employee Information
- Customer Information / PII
- Company Information / IP
- Hallucinations
- Deepfakes
- Disinformation + Conspiracy Theories
- Race
- Gender
- Political
- Disability
- Religion
- Sexual Orientation
- And more...
- Copyright + Trademarks
- Legal + Ethical Misuse
- Brand Reputation
- Self-Harm + Dangerous Advice
- Violence + Crime Promotion and/or Enablement
- Offensive Material
- Hate Speech
Ensure Your AI is Safe, Reliable, + Compliant.
Reduce the Risk of AI-Related Incidents
Protect your reputation and avoid costly fines.
Enhance AI Reliability
Ensure your AI systems deliver accurate and consistent results.
Promote fairness and equity in your AI applications.
Identify + Resolve Biases
Gain a Competitive Edge
Demonstrate your commitment to responsible AI development.
Project Management
Define goals and track progress efficiently for streamlined results.
The Importance of Continuous Testing + Training for GenAI Models.
To meet regulations such as the California Generative AI Accountability Act (SB 896, 2024), the California Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Models (SB 1047, 2024), the Executive Order on AI (2023), and the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (2022), AI systems require continuous monitoring and independent evaluation.
Brand Reputational Damage
Customer Loss From Negative Experience
Financial Fines, Penalties, + Other Legal Action
Operational Disruptions + Security Breaches
Regulatory + Non-Compliance
Real-World Incidents.
AI Customer Service Failures and Passenger Frustration
A well-known airline’s AI chatbot faced negative news coverage due to its inability to handle complex customer service issues during peak travel disruptions. The lack of adequate training and human oversight contributed to the problem.
This incident highlights the risks of deploying AI without proper testing that is harmful to brand reputation. By ensuring AI systems are well-trained, adaptable, and supported by human oversight, companies can mitigate these risks and avoid similar negative customer experiences.
AI-Generated Financial Content and Credibility Issues
A major online publication faced backlash after using an AI model to generate financial articles that contained inaccuracies and plagiarism. The AI-generated content was not adequately fact-checked and relied on flawed or incomplete data.
This incident damaged the publication’s reputation and forced the platform to review its AI use and test abnormal breaks in the model’s output. The incident demonstrates the importance of red teaming and thorough quality control when using AI to generate public-facing content, especially in areas like finance that require high accuracy.
AI Bias in Recruitment and Discriminatory Hiring Practices
A major beauty company came under scrutiny for its AI-driven recruitment tool’s discriminatory practices. The tool was trained on biased data, perpetuating existing inequalities and unfairly excluding underrepresented groups.
This incident highlights the importance of ethical AI development and the need for diverse, unbiased training data to avoid discrimination. Transparent AI governance is also crucial in decision-making processes that impact people’s lives. This could have been avoided by actively testing the model against risk vulnerabilities like bias.
AI Chatbot Missteps and Inappropriate Responses to Minors
A social media platform faced criticism for its AI chatbot’s inappropriate responses to minors. The chatbot lacked sufficient moderation and training for sensitive interactions, leading to harmful conversations.
This incident highlights the importance of robust safety measures, content filtering, and age-appropriate interactions when deploying AI chatbots, especially on platforms with young users. Additionally, automated testing could have helped identify vulnerabilities in the chatbot’s responses and prevent harmful interactions.
How it Works.
Why
Choose Us?
Industry-Leading Expertise
Innodata brings +35 years of data engineering expertise and a trained red teaming division that focuses on AI safety and compliance.
Client-Focused Approach
We work closely with our clients to understand their specific needs and challenges.
Comprehensive Testing Capabilities
We offer a robust testing methodology to address a comprehensive taxonomy of risk factors.
Commitment to Ethical AI
We believe in the responsible development and deployment of AI.
Innodata's GenAl platform excels at answering single and multi-prompt questions, which is particularly valuable during unplanned interruptions.
Principal Product Manager,
Leading Online Learning Platform
Request BETA Access
CASE STUDIES
Success Stories
See how top companies are transforming their AI initiatives with Innodata’s comprehensive solutions and platforms. Ready to be our next success story?