Is Your Data Good Enough for AI?
A Checklist for Data Quality KPIs and Roadblocks
You can’t build intelligent AI systems on unreliable data. Nearly 59% of organizations don’t measure data quality, and it costs them an average of $12.9 million a year. So how do you assess your data’s readiness?
Siloed systems, manual errors, and legacy architectures can contribute to poor data quality and jeopardize AI/ML outcomes. Using them without preparing the data for AI could result in poor results and decision-making. Let us understand how to define and measure data quality using KPIs while identifying roadblocks and practical solutions.
What is Data Quality & Why Does It Matter?
Data quality refers to how well data reflects real-world entities and supports its intended use. To accurately measure this, enterprises need to monitor both long-term and operational metrics.
The two categories of KPIs are:
- Common KPIs assess ongoing data health.
- Incident-Based KPIs: Focus on errors, pipeline disruptions, and remediation.
High data quality leads to trustworthy analytics, reliable AI models, and regulatory compliance. Poor quality can lead to decisions based on incorrect data, fines, and reputational damage.
Types of KPIs to Measure Data Quality
Each KPI type serves a different purpose:
Use Case | Common KPIs | Incident-Based KPIs |
Long-term quality monitoring | ✅ |
|
Real-time issue tracking |
| ✅ |
Data governance & compliance | ✅ | ✅ |
AI/ML model training input validation | ✅ |
|
Pipeline health & error remediation |
| ✅ |
SLA adherence & operational analytics |
| ✅ |
Enterprise reporting/dashboards | ✅ | ✅ |
KPIs for Data Quality
Common KPIs
1. Accessibility & Timeliness
Accessibility ensures that users can retrieve data when needed. Timeliness ensures that the data is delivered quickly enough to remain actionable for real-time alerts or scheduled reports.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Availability, access speed, query responsiveness, and data delivery timelines |
| Delays in access or delivery slow decision-making, stall analytics, and reduce AI system effectiveness |
2. Completeness & Relevancy
Completeness ensures that all necessary data is present, while relevancy checks that the data is meaningful and serves its intended business purpose.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Presence of required fields and business alignment of datasets |
| Missing or irrelevant data causes bias, drives up costs, and leads to model drift or misaligned insights |
3. Consistency
Consistency ensures that data values remain uniform across systems and over time, like maintaining the same product code or customer ID in every system.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Data alignment across platforms and time | ≥99% field consistency & no temporal errors (e.g., age decreases) | Prevents integration failures, reporting mismatches, and AI model instability |
4. Accuracy & Validity
Accuracy ensures the data correctly reflects reality. Validity ensures the data adheres to defined formats, schema constraints, and business rules.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Real-world correctness and rule-based conformity |
| Errors in accuracy or format compromise compliance, create rework and degrade AI performance |
5. Precision
Precision measures how consistent and repeatable data annotations or labels are across multiple reviewers or systems.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Inter-rater agreement and reproducibility of labels | ≥90% agreement across repeated annotations | Inconsistent labeling introduces bias and weakens training data for ML models |
6. Uniqueness
Uniqueness ensures that each record appears only once in a dataset with no duplicates or redundancy.
What It Measures | Targets | Risk |
Duplicate record detection and prevention | ≥99% unique records and ≤1% duplicates | Duplicates inflate costs, skew analytics, and compromise model reliability |
Incident-Based KPIs
1. Total Number of Data Incidents
This tracks how often data quality issues are detected across systems, providing a snapshot of overall data stability.
What It Measures | Targets | Why It Matters |
Frequency and severity of data quality issues flagged | <5 critical incidents per day or <50 per month, categorized by severity | High incident rates mean quality failures that can corrupt downstream analytics and AI pipelines |
2. Time to Detection (Median Time to Detect)
Time to detection measures how long it takes to identify a data issue after it occurs.
What It Measures | Targets | Why It Matters |
The time between issue occurrence and detection |
| Delayed detection lets faulty data circulate across reports and models, increasing business risk and rework |
3. Time to Resolution (Mean Time to Repair, MTTR)
This metric captures how quickly data issues are resolved once detected.
What It Measures | Targets | Why It Matters |
Duration from issue detection to resolution |
| Prolonged resolution disrupts pipelines, breaches SLAs, and introduces lag in analytics and AI model updates |
4. Data Asset Uptime
Data asset uptime monitors how consistently key datasets or pipelines remain operational and free from critical errors.
What It Measures | Targets | Why It Matters |
Dataset/pipeline availability and error-free periods | ≥99% uptime for priority assets, tracked over consecutive error-free days | Downtime affects analytics delivery, disrupts decision workflows, and undermines model accuracy in production |
5. Data Usage/Importance Score
This score ranks datasets based on how frequently they are used, their business importance, and the number of dependent systems or teams.
What It Measures | Targets | Why It Matters |
Composite of usage frequency, value, and downstream impact | Weighted score based on query volume, consumers, and revenue linkages | Helps prioritize monitoring and quality improvements for datasets with the most business or AI impact |
Common Roadblocks to Data Quality KPIs & How to Fix Them
Data Silos & Integration Complexity
- Impact: Mismatches, redundancies, and gaps across systems hurt data consistency, uniqueness, and accuracy. This leads to flawed analytics and unstable AI pipelines.
- Fix: Implement unified data pipelines, centralized schemas, and cross-platform metadata standards to streamline ingestion and ensure consistent definitions.
Lack of Automated Observability
- Impact: Without monitoring, issues like missing fields, schema drift, or delayed batches go undetected, directly affecting timeliness, completeness, and operational SLAs.
- Fix: Use automated quality checks, real-time dashboards, and anomaly detection tools to flag and resolve issues before they impact downstream systems.
Privacy & Compliance Risk
- Impact: Invalid or incomplete records risk breaching regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, exposing the business to fines and legal consequences.
- Fix: Embed data governance policies, implement validation rules, and enforce audit trails across pipelines. Align practices with frameworks such as ISO 8000-63.
Bias & Fairness in AI Training
- Impact: Skewed or non-representative datasets result in biased models, harming accuracy, precision, and public trust.
- Fix: Conduct bias audits, use balanced training data, and integrate HITL validation (Human-in-the-Loop) workflows with SME oversight for critical data.
Using Data that Delivers for Your Enterprise AI
Strong data quality is important for effective analytics, compliance, and reliable AI. As data volume and AI adoption grow, scalable and ethical data practices continue to become a necessity.
Start now by evaluating your data quality! Connect with an Innodata expert to explore how our data solutions ensure your enterprise is AI-ready.
Bring Intelligence to Your Enterprise Processes with Generative AI.
Innodata provides high-quality data solutions for developing industry-leading generative AI models, including diverse golden datasets, fine-tuning data, human preference optimization, red teaming, model safety, and evaluation.
Follow Us
